手机APP下载

您现在的位置: 首页 > 英语六级 > 六级真题 > 六级考试历年真题 > 正文

2008年6月大学英语六级考试真题及答案

来源:可可英语 编辑:Baul   可可英语APP下载 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet

Passage Two

Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fights. We are pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I’ve twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids’ college background as e prize demonstrating how well we’ve raised them. But we can’t acknowledge that our obsession(痴迷) is more about us than them. So we’ve contrived various justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn’t matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won’t be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria(歇斯底里) is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible——and mostly wrong. We haven’t found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don’t systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures——professors’ feedback and the number of essay exams——selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates’ lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-poinnt increase in a school’s average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke(偶然). A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as much as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges.Getting into yale may signify intellgence,talent and ambition. But it’s not the only indicator and,paradoxically,its significance is declining.The reason:so many similar people go where.Getting into college is not life only competiton.Old-boy networks are breaking down.princeton economist Alan Krueger studied admissions to one top Ph.D.program.High scores on the GRE helpd explain who got in;degrees of prestigious universities didn’t.

So,parents,lighten up.the stakes have been vastly exaggerated.up to a point,we can rationalize our pushiness.America is a competitive society;our kids need to adjust to that.but too much pushiness can be destructive.the very ambition we impose on our children may get some into Harvard but may also set them up for disappointment.one study found that,other things being equal,graduates of highly selective schools experienced more job dissatisfaction.They may have been so conditioned to deing on top that anything less disappoints.

注意 此部分试题请在答题卡2上作答。

57.Why dose the author say that parengs are the true fighters in the college-admissions wars?

A.They have the final say in which university their children are to attend.

B.They know best which universities are most suitable for their children.

C.they have to carry out intensive surveys of colleges before children make an application.

D.they care more about which college their children go to than the children themselves.

58.Why do parents urge their children to apply to more school than ever?

A.they want to increase their children chances of entering a prestigious college.

B.they hope their children can enter a university that offers attractive scholarships.

C.Their children eill have have a wider choice of which college to go to.

D.Elite universities now enroll fewer syudent than they used to.

59.What does the author mean by kids count more than their college(Line1,para.4?

A.Continuing education is more important to a person success.

B.A person happiness should be valued more than their education.

C.Kids actual abilities are more importang than their college background.

D.What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements.

60.What does Krueger study tell us?

A.GETting into Ph.d.programs may be more competitive than getting into college.

B.Degrees of prestigious universities do not guarantee entry to graduate programs.

C.Graduates from prestigious universities do not care much about their GRE scores.

D.Connections built in prestigious universities may be sustained long after graduation.

61.One possible result of pushing children into elite universities is that______.

A.they earb less than their peers from other institutions

B.they turn out to be less competitive in the job market

C.they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation

D.they overemphasize their qualifications in job application

重点单词   查看全部解释    
chronic ['krɔnik]

想一想再看

adj. 长期的,慢性的,惯常的

联想记忆
conversation [.kɔnvə'seiʃən]

想一想再看

n. 会话,谈话

联想记忆
selectivity [silek'tiviti]

想一想再看

n. 选择性;分离性;选择度

联想记忆
dose [dəus]

想一想再看

n. 剂量,一剂,一服
vt. 给 ... 服

 
regenerate [ri'dʒenərit]

想一想再看

vt. 再生
adj. 再生的,复原的

联想记忆
obvious ['ɔbviəs]

想一想再看

adj. 明显的,显然的

联想记忆
insurance [in'ʃuərəns]

想一想再看

n. 保险,保险费,安全措施

联想记忆
valuable ['væljuəbl]

想一想再看

adj. 贵重的,有价值的
n. (pl.)贵

联想记忆
contemptuous [kən'temptjuəs]

想一想再看

adj. 轻视的

 
employ [im'plɔi]

想一想再看

雇用,使用

 

发布评论我来说2句

    最新文章

    可可英语官方微信(微信号:ikekenet)

    每天向大家推送短小精悍的英语学习资料.

    添加方式1.扫描上方可可官方微信二维码。
    添加方式2.搜索微信号ikekenet添加即可。