评论
打印
Why not both? Part Two. Just the other day, I talked about why not both when I was talking about
鱼和熊掌可以兼得第二集，前几天我们谈论了鱼和熊掌的故事，
quality and quantity about content and today making a quick little video,
当时我们说的是内容的质量和数量之间的关系，我今天想简短说几句，
because I feel like a lot of people asking me a question about what happened today
因为有许多人问我今天发生的一些事情，
which was Fast Company reported that I'm working on another agency called Grape Story to represent Vine celebrities
就是《快公司》报道称我正在建立一家名叫“葡萄故事”的公司，来代理“Vine”视频应用上的红人，
which is true and on the same day, Facebook and Instagram announcing that they're doing now video 15-second-videos on their platform
这篇报道说得对，而就在同一天，“脸书”和“Instagram”宣布也开始在平台上创建15秒短视频服务，
and of course I see all these comments now like Vine is dead or this would be another Poke and it won't work for Instagram.
我还看到了许多网友评论，说“Vine”要完了，说这将成为下一个“Poke”应用，这对“Instagram”起不了什么作用。
They'll be like, kind of the Snapchat, Poke thing and my question is why not both?
这就好比是“色拉布”和“Poke”之间的战争，但我的问题是为什么鱼和熊掌不能兼得？
Why can't both Instagram 15-second nonooping videos and Vine six-second looping videos work?
为什么“Instagram”的15秒非循环录像，和“Vine”的6秒循环录像不能兼得？
You know Facebook and Twitter work. They're different enough. They're both at scale.
你看“脸书”和“推特”不是兼容得好好的，他们的不同之处很多，他们的规模都很大。
They're also backed by the number one and two social networks in the world.
并且得到了全球社媒的支持。
So to give you my official answer which is the question I've been asked so much on Twitter.
“推特”上有许多网友问我这个问题，我想在这里正式表明我的态度。
Why not both? I think both win. I have nothing but respect for Zucks and Kevin Systrom to the best in the game.
为什么不可以兼得？ 我认为他们都会取得很辉煌的成就，我非常敬重扎克伯格和凯文·斯特罗姆。
I have incredible respect for Dom Hofmann and Vine team and the Twitter Peeps.
同样我也对多姆·霍夫曼和他的“Vine”团队表示尊重。
I think both are gonna win. I think they are different. I think you've got story tell differently.
我觉得它们都会取得成功，两者有许多不同，因为故事叙述形式不一样。
One is ironically long-form, 15 seconds. One is shorter-form six seconds.
一个是时间比较长的15秒钟，一个是比较短的6秒钟，
I think they're gonna have different actions, different needs.
我觉得两者会有不同的行动，不同的需求。
Different people will pop out and be successful on both. Some people are good at status updates on Facebook and not on Twitter and vice versa.
他们会吸引不同需求的人群，两款应用都能够让用户取得成功，许多人擅长在“脸书”上更新状态而不是“推特”，但有些人正好相反。
This is a place where I see both winning.
我觉得两家公司都能够取得成功。
